Case 3312167/2020 · Employment Tribunal
L S Fire Solutions Limited v Mr Matthew Bullock — 2020
- Case reference
- 3312167/2020
- Decision date
- 31 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto
Parties
2 namedClaimant
L S Fire Solutions Limited
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim before Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto was the claimant employer's contract claim against Mr Matthew Bullock. The judgment records that the claim was struck out because it had no reasonable prospect of success, as it did not appear to give rise to a financial claim under the Employment Tribunals (Extension of Jurisdiction) Order.
The tribunal had first given the claimant an opportunity by letter dated 30 November 2020 to make representations in writing or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not make representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the claim was struck out. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal described this as the employer's contract claim and struck it out under rule 37. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- Employment Tribunals (Extension of Jurisdiction) Order
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.