Case 3312191/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Moyse v Suffolk County Properties Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3312191/2020
- Decision date
- 2 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laidler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Moyse
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr K Moyse had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and that he was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,807.00. The judgment records that the case was determined under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal also found that Suffolk County Properties Ltd failed to provide a written statement of particulars of employment contrary to section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It ordered the respondent to pay £1,692.31 in respect of that breach.
The total award payable by the respondent to the claimant was £5,499.31, made up of the redundancy payment and the separate award for the section 1 breach.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £3,807 |
| Other | The judgment states that the respondent failed to provide a written statement of particulars of employment contrary to section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and ordered £1,692.31 in respect of that breach. | Upheld | — | £1,692 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,499
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.