Case 3312192/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Pasquale Nicodemo v My Gusto Delivery Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3312192/2020
- Decision date
- 21 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Cline
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Pasquale Nicodemo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a CVP hearing in Reading on 15 July 2022 before Employment Judge Robert Cline, the respondent did not attend and was not represented. The tribunal recorded that reasonable steps had been taken to notify the respondent and proceeded in its absence under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure. Mr Pasquale Nicodemo confirmed that claim number 3312193/2020 was a duplicate created in error and was withdrawn.
In claim 3312192/2020, the tribunal ordered My Gusto Delivery Limited to pay gross sums of £33,192.11 for salary and notice pay, and £7,269.15 for holiday entitlement, each payable within 14 days. The judgment was recorded orally at the hearing, and the written record notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. The decision contains the orders only and does not set out further findings on liability beyond the respondent's failure to pay the sums claimed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Gross sum awarded for unpaid salary and notice pay; the judgment does not split those two elements further. | Upheld | — | £33,192 |
| Holiday pay | Gross sum awarded for unpaid holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £7,269 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £40,461
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.