Case 3312204/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Eriki Ventures Ltd - in voluntary liquidation — 2021
- Case reference
- 3312204/2020
- Decision date
- 17 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a Rule 21 Employment Tribunal judgment in which the respondent did not appear or present a response, and the tribunal recorded that the claim succeeds. The extracted text identifies the claimant as Ashton Almeida and the respondent as Eriki Ventures Ltd, in voluntary liquidation, but it does not set out the factual or legal basis of the underlying claim(s). The judgment does not record any substantive liability findings beyond the success of the claim.
The tribunal stated that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled would be determined at a Remedy Hearing. No monetary award is set out in the extracted text, and no breakdown of remedy is provided. The judgment therefore records a successful claim outcome only, with remedy left outstanding for later determination.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Rule 21 judgment. The extracted text does not specify the underlying claim type(s) or any split between claims; it only states that the claim succeeds and that remedy will be determined at a Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.