Case 3312210/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Janet Sykes v OCS Integrated Solutions Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 3312210/2023
- Decision date
- 8 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Young
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Janet Sykes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs Janet Sykes brought a claim against OCS Integrated Solutions Ltd at Watford Employment Tribunal. The case was heard on 17, 18 and 19 February 2025 before Employment Judge Young sitting alone, with the Claimant appearing in person and the Respondent represented by counsel.
The only determination recorded in the written judgment is that the Claimant’s claim for constructive unfair dismissal was not well founded and was dismissed. The document does not set out the tribunal’s factual findings or legal reasoning in the extracted text provided.
The record notes that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The written judgment states that the Claimant’s claim for constructive unfair dismissal was not well founded and was dismissed. No written reasons were provided in the record supplied. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.