Case 3312232/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms T Rossi Correia Da Silva v CR Bedford Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 3312232/2023
- Decision date
- 2 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davey Representation
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms T Rossi Correia Da Silva
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningCR Bedford Ltd was added as respondent in substitution for Coffee Republic. The tribunal heard the matter by CVP in Cambridge on 26 November 2024, with the respondent not attending. It rejected the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages, finding that no unauthorised deduction had been made.
The tribunal upheld the holiday pay complaint. It found that when the claimant's employment ended, the respondent had failed to pay holiday accrued but not taken, and it ordered payment of £746.30, with the claimant responsible for any tax or National Insurance due on that sum. The separate breach of contract claim in relation to notice pay was dismissed because the claimant was not entitled to notice pay.
The tribunal also found that, when the proceedings were begun, the respondent was in breach of its duty to provide the claimant with a written statement of employment particulars. It recorded that there were no exceptional circumstances making an award of an amount equal to two weeks' gross pay unjust or inequitable, and ordered payment of £924. The total award recorded by the judgment is £1,670.30.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages; tribunal found no unauthorised deduction. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Tribunal found the respondent failed to pay for holidays accrued but not taken when employment ended. | Upheld | — | £746 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim failed because the claimant was not entitled to notice pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Breach of duty to provide a written statement of employment particulars; the tribunal awarded two weeks' gross pay. | Upheld | — | £924 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,670
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.