Case 3312310/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Dr James Holt c/o Matt Fox, Liquidator of Abracadabra Leaflet Distribution Ltd and others — 2019
- Case reference
- 3312310/2019
- Decision date
- 12 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lang
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Lang sat alone at Reading on 12 December 2019. The written record states that the claimant, Mr S Colville, did not attend or take part, and that Mr D Bheemah of Counsel appeared for the respondent side.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant's complaints against R4, Kare Group Ltd, were dismissed on withdrawal. No substantive findings on the merits of those complaints are set out in this short judgment, and no remedy was recorded for them.
The judgment also states that the claimant's complaints against R1 and R2 continued. This decision is therefore procedural only and does not determine the merits of the remaining complaints. The record notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the claimant's complaints against R4 were dismissed on withdrawal. It does not identify the underlying legal category for those complaints. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.