Case 3312316/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Ramella v HSBC Bank plc — 2022
- Case reference
- 3312316/2020
- Decision date
- 26 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shore Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Ramella
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a public preliminary hearing, the Tribunal recorded that the claimant's claims of age discrimination, unauthorised deduction of wages, failure to pay holiday pay and any other money payments had been struck out on 26 February 2021. The judgment also records that the claims of age discrimination, holiday pay or other payments are struck out.
The Tribunal did not strike out any other part of the claimant's case for having no reasonable prospect of success and did not make any part of the claim subject to a deposit order for having little reasonable prospect of success. It also found that the claimant's claims were not scandalous or vexatious.
The Tribunal did not have time to consider whether any part of the claims should be struck out on the basis that they had not been actively pursued, but stated that the respondent could seek relisting of that application.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The judgment states that the claimant's age discrimination claim was struck out on 26 February 2021 and records again that the age discrimination claim is struck out. | Struck out | Age | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claimant's unauthorised deduction of wages claim was struck out on 26 February 2021. | Struck out | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the claimant's failure to pay holiday pay claim was struck out on 26 February 2021 and records again that the holiday pay claim is struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | The judgment refers to claims for any other money payments, and later to other payments, being struck out. The specific legal basis of those payment claims is not identified in the text. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.