Case 3312321/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Venables v Roseland Lodge Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3312321/2019
- Decision date
- 1 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren Representation
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Venables
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Norwich Employment Tribunal case heard on 1 November 2019 before Employment Judge M Warren. The claimant, Mrs A Venables, did not attend the hearing; the respondent, Roseland Lodge Limited, was represented by Mr Stringer.
The judgment states that, upon the claimant not attending, the claimant's claims were struck out on the ground that they were not being actively pursued. The extracted text does not set out any separate liability findings on the underlying claims, and it does not identify individual claim headings within the strike-out order.
No monetary award was made. The judgment is a short case-management outcome rather than a substantive merits decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the individual claim types in the strike-out order; it states only that the claimant's claims were struck out because she did not attend and the claims were not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.