Case 3312343/2023 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Axiom Ince Limited (In Administration) — 2025
- Case reference
- 3312343/2023
- Decision date
- 7 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not defend the claims after entering administration, and the tribunal considered there was sufficient information on the file to give Rule 22 judgment on liability and holiday pay. The claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal, unpaid holiday pay on termination, and wrongful dismissal were found well founded or successful.
The claimant had been employed as an executive assistant from 7 March 2017 under a written contract providing for three months' notice. The respondent terminated his employment summarily on 4 September 2023, in breach of that term. The tribunal accepted evidence about salary, pension, car benefit, the timing of new employment, and reduced earnings in the new role.
For unfair dismissal remedy, the tribunal awarded a basic award and only £500 for loss of statutory rights, finding that further compensation would duplicate the contractual damages award and that, applying Polkey, the employment would have ended fairly that autumn by reason of redundancy. For wrongful dismissal, the tribunal awarded damages for breach of the contractual notice provision, finding that the claimant had suffered proven loss and had reasonably mitigated it after two and a half months.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal awarded a Basic Award of £3,858 and a Compensatory Award of £500. It made no unfair dismissal compensatory award beyond loss of statutory rights, citing duplication with the damages award and Polkey. | Upheld | — | £4,358 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal awarded £1,153 gross for one week's unpaid holiday pay on termination. | Upheld | — | £1,153 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was summarily dismissed in breach of a contractual three-month notice term and awarded £16,282 in damages. | Upheld | — | £16,282 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £21,793
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £3,858
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £500
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 22 judgment
- Regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998
- Polkey principle
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.