Case 3312352/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Did not attend and was not represented For the v OCS Food Co Ltd and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 3312352/2023
- Decision date
- 14 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Appearances
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Did not attend and was not represented For the
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Norwich by CVP on 25 July 2024 before Employment Judge Postle. The Claimant, Mr Dennis McKenzie, did not attend and was not represented. The Respondent was represented by Mr J Conley, solicitor.
The Tribunal recorded that the Claimant had failed to attend the hearing and had provided no medical reason for his non-attendance. It also noted that this was the second time he had failed to attend a case management hearing, the earlier occasion being 14 March 2024.
In those circumstances, the Tribunal dismissed the Claimant's claims against OCS Food Co Limited, formerly Atalian Servest Food Company Limited, as no longer actively pursued. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on liability or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Dismissed when the Tribunal noted the Claimant's failure to attend and that the claims were no longer actively pursued. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed when the Tribunal noted the Claimant's failure to attend and that the claims were no longer actively pursued. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed when the Tribunal noted the Claimant's failure to attend and that the claims were no longer actively pursued. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Dismissed when the Tribunal noted the Claimant's failure to attend and that the claims were no longer actively pursued. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.