Case 3312366/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Hatch (Counsel). For the v Mr P Collyer (Tribunal Advocate). — 2021
- Case reference
- 3312366/2020
- Decision date
- 23 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Hatch (Counsel). For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Cambridge by CVP before Employment Judge Ord on 22 September 2021, found that Mr M Joyce had been unfairly dismissed by AGS Limited. It also found that he was dismissed in breach of his contract of employment.
In addition, the tribunal found that the claimant had not been paid for any accrued but outstanding holidays due at the date of his dismissal on 24 June 2020. The judgment records that the remedy would be determined at a separate hearing, so no monetary award is set out in this decision.
This is a liability judgment only. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's note.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the claimant had not been paid for accrued but outstanding holiday due at the date of dismissal, 24 June 2020. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.