Case 3312379/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Adamu v Vision Security With Vision — 2019
- Case reference
- 3312379/2019
- Decision date
- 24 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Adamu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Ord struck out the claim under rule 37. The tribunal had written on 26/06/2019 giving the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because he had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 20/03/2019 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal ordered that the claim be struck out. The hearing listed for 25/11/2019 was vacated and did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type(s); it records only that the claim was struck out under rule 37 for non-compliance with the tribunal's order dated 20/03/2019 and because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.