Case 3312393/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Bennett v Quadgraphics Limited (In Voluntary Liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 3312393/2023
- Decision date
- 15 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fitzgerald Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Bennett
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant, Mr P Bennett, brought claims against Quadgraphics Limited (In Voluntary Liquidation), which did not attend the hearing. The tribunal found that his claim of constructive dismissal succeeded and awarded a basic award of £14,798 and a compensatory award of £1,616.84.
The tribunal also found that the Claimant had been wrongfully dismissed. It recorded that he was not given the 12 weeks' notice to which he was entitled as his minimum statutory notice under the Employment Rights Act 1996, and awarded £4,223.56, described as 12 weeks' wages less mitigation.
The tribunal further upheld the unlawful deduction of wages claim, finding that £1,176.04 had been unlawfully deducted in June and July 2023. It directed that appropriate deductions for income tax and national insurance could be made from the payments above, except that the basic award should be paid gross.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal said the constructive dismissal claim succeeded and awarded a basic award of £14,798 and a compensatory award of £1,616.84. | Upheld | — | £16,415 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the Claimant was not given the 12 weeks' notice he was entitled to as minimum statutory notice under the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £4,224 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unlawful deductions from wages for June and July 2023. | Upheld | — | £1,176 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £21,814
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £14,798
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £1,617
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.