Case 3312399/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Nagy v Borer Data Systems Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3312399/2020
- Decision date
- 26 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Vowles Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Nagy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not enter a response, so the tribunal entered judgment under Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The only claim recorded in the judgment was unauthorised deduction from wages.
For Mr T Nagy, the tribunal found that wages were owed and awarded £1,846.03 in compensation, with an order that the respondent pay that sum to him. For Mr G Gobolyos, the tribunal found that wages were owed and awarded £1,390.66 in compensation, with a corresponding order for payment.
The judgment does not record any contested factual findings, because no response was entered. It also does not set out any separate remedy heads beyond the two compensation awards. The aggregate amount payable on the judgment is £3,236.69.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 default judgment; the tribunal found Mr Nagy was owed wages and awarded compensation of £1,846.03. | Upheld | — | £1,846 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 default judgment; the tribunal found Mr Gobolyos was owed wages and awarded compensation of £1,390.66. | Upheld | — | £1,391 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,237
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £3,237
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.