Case 3312401/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Wysocki-Jones v Varsity Education Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3312401/2019
- Decision date
- 8 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Wysocki-Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Anstis Date recorded that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £3,064.49. The tribunal also ordered £5,416.66 for dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice, £4,875.00 for unpaid bonus, and £400 for unpaid expenses.
The judgment further found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £2,032, together with £222.60 for holiday entitlement. On the unfair dismissal claim, the tribunal found in the claimant's favour but stated that the remedy would be determined at a later Remedy Hearing.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £3,064 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £5,417 |
| Breach of contract | Award for unpaid bonus entitlement. | Upheld | — | £4,875 |
| Breach of contract | Award for unpaid expenses entitlement. | Upheld | — | £400 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £2,032 |
| Holiday pay | Award for unpaid holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £223 |
| Unfair dismissal | Liability was found, but the remedy was to be determined at a later Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £16,011
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.