Case 3312406/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Sujeskaran v Burntoak Wines Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3312406/2020
- Decision date
- 8 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Sujeskaran
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 8 December 2020, the tribunal gave Mr B Sujeskaran an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why his unfair dismissal complaint should not be struck out. The tribunal stated that the claim appeared to be vulnerable because the claimant did not have two or more years' continuous employment.
Mr Sujeskaran did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the complaint of unfair dismissal. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint because the claimant did not make written representations, make sufficient representations, or request a hearing after being given that opportunity by letter dated 8 December 2020. The reason given was that it appeared the claimant did not have two or more years' continuous employment. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.