Case 3312406/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Dr. A. Raithatha v Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust — 2024
- Case reference
- 3312406/2023
- Decision date
- 10 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S. Matthews Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Dr. A. Raithatha
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningDr A. Raithatha worked as a locum doctor for Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust from 14 February 2022 to 12 July 2023. The dispute was whether the hourly rate he was paid for bank work already included rolled-up holiday pay, or whether holiday pay should have been added separately at 12.07% under the unlawful deductions from wages provisions in s.13 ERA 1996.
The tribunal found that the Change to T&C document signed on 8 September 2021 was ambiguous on its own, but the Bank Registration Document, read together with the rate cards, made the composite nature of the rate clear. The rate cards stated that the hourly rate included holiday pay, and later cards and payslips used the acronym "WTD" to identify the holiday-pay element. The tribunal accepted that the BRD explained that WTD meant holiday pay and held that the arrangement was transparent and comprehensible when the documents were read together.
The tribunal found that the first rate card ending 6 November 2022 was not emailed to the claimant, but it was available on the intranet and the claimant probably saw the rate in writing before completing timesheets. In any event, the claimant was supplied with the later rate cards from 7 November 2022, which clearly showed the rate split. The tribunal also held that any claim for deductions before 7 November 2022 was out of time because the alleged series of deductions ended when the November 2022 rate card was received.
The unlawful deduction from wages claim was therefore not well founded and was dismissed. A separate claim for failure to provide section 1 ERA particulars of employment was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. The respondent's pleaded set-off point about an alleged overpayment was not pursued and no finding was made on it.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim under s.13 ERA 1996 about whether the hourly rate already included rolled-up holiday pay; tribunal held the rate and holiday pay arrangements were transparent and comprehensible, and also found the claim for deductions before 7 November 2022 was out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Claim for failure to provide section 1 Employment Rights Act particulars of employment; dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- s.23 ERA 1996
- s.13 ERA 1996
- Agarwal v Cardiff University and anor
- Robinson-Steele v RD Retail Services Ltd
- Lyddon v Englefield Brickwork Ltd
- Smith v AJ Morrisroes and Sons Ltd
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.