Case 3312410/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person, supported by her Husband Mr J Nkala For the v Mrs S Shah, Solicitor — 2019
- Case reference
- 3312410/2019
- Decision date
- 19 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Appearances
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person, supported by her Husband Mr J Nkala For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 10 December 2019 before Employment Judge Johnson in Cambridge, the Claimant withdrew her complaint of detriments arising from the making of a protected disclosure under section 43B of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal recorded that complaint as dismissed following withdrawal.
The judgment also records that all other complaints raised by the Claimant in the proceedings remained in issue and would be considered at the Full Merits Hearing. No findings were made on those remaining complaints in this judgment, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The complaint of detriments arising from the bringing of a protected disclosure under section 43B ERA 1996 was withdrawn by the Claimant and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.