Case 3312410/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v S Rafiq (lay representative) — 2025
- Case reference
- 3312410/2023
- Decision date
- 17 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge W Anderson Appearances
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant worked for the respondent sandwich shop from 24 June 2023 to 14 July 2023 as a sandwich maker. The tribunal found that he was dismissed for gross misconduct on 14 July 2023. It accepted that he had been given a copy of his contract, which authorised deductions for lock and fob replacement, 15 hours of training costs if employment ended within four months, and certain uniform items if not returned on termination.
The tribunal found that the claimant worked 57.5 hours on the rotas produced, plus 15 hours of training on 24 June 2023 and 2 July 2023, giving 72.5 hours in total at £10.42 per hour and gross wages of £755.45. It accepted that the respondent changed the locks on 11 August 2023 after the key had not been returned, and held that the £457 lock replacement deduction and £156.30 training deduction were contractually authorised. The tribunal also noted that the respondent did not provide a payslip itemising the deductions.
The tribunal held that the £35 uniform deduction was not authorised by the contract. The contractual wording referred to notice of termination and return of uniform before final pay, but the claimant had been summarily dismissed and was told not to attend the shop, so he could not return the uniform. The claim was therefore upheld in part, and the respondent was ordered to pay £142.15, less any necessary tax and national insurance deductions, within 14 days of the judgment being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Upheld in part only. The tribunal found the £457 lock replacement deduction and £156.30 training deduction were authorised, but the £35 uniform deduction was not authorised. | Upheld | — | £142 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £142
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.