Case 3312413/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Choudery v Dinesh Dhingra — 2020
- Case reference
- 3312413/2020
- Decision date
- 23 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Choudery
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Miss S Choudery's complaint of unfair dismissal. It recorded that, by letter dated 23 November 2020, the claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing explaining why the claim should not be struck out. The reason identified was that the claimant had not responded to the tribunal's letter dated 23 November 2020.
The tribunal found that the claimant had failed to make written representations, or had failed to make any sufficient representations, and had not requested a hearing. On that basis, the unfair dismissal claim was struck out. No monetary remedy was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint under rule 37 after the claimant did not respond to the tribunal's letter dated 23 November 2020 and did not make sufficient written representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.