Case 3312414/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v The Chair (Buckingham) Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3312414/2020
- Decision date
- 18 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the Claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal was well founded and awarded a basic award of £1,276.50 and a compensatory award of £8,886.42. It also found that, when proceedings began, the Respondent was in breach of its duty under Part 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 to provide written employment particulars, and increased the award by £1,702.00 under section 38(4).
The tribunal found that the Claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract because she was not given notice or paid in lieu of notice, but made no separate damages award because those damages were covered by the unfair dismissal compensatory award. It also declared that the Respondent made deductions from wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and ordered payment of £1,190.16. The total of those sums was £13,055.08, and a separate preparation time order of £820.00 was made.
The Respondent did not attend the hearing. The judge was satisfied that the Respondent had notice of the hearing and chose not to attend, and proceeded in its absence while having regard to its case as set out in the ET3 and correspondence. The Respondent's employer's contract claim against the Claimant was dismissed as not well founded.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal awarded a basic award of £1,276.50 and a compensatory award of £8,886.42 for unfair dismissal. | Upheld | — | £10,163 |
| Other | The tribunal found the Respondent was in breach of its duty under Part 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 to provide a written statement of employment particulars and increased the award by the higher amount under section 38(4). | Upheld | — | £1,702 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the complaint that the Claimant was dismissed in breach of contract by not being given notice or paid in lieu of notice was well founded, but made no separate damages award because any damages were covered by the compensatory award for unfair dismissal. | Upheld | — | £0 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal declared that deductions from wages contravened section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and ordered payment of £1,190.16. | Upheld | — | £1,190 |
| Breach of contract | The Respondent's employer's contract claim against the Claimant was found not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,055
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,277
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £8,886
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- Part 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 38(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.