Case 3312416/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O Opayemi v McKesson UK — 2019
- Case reference
- 3312416/2019
- Decision date
- 4 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr O Opayemi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment because no response to the claim had been received. Employment Judge Ord recorded that the Claimant, Mr O Opayemi, brought complaints against McKesson UK Holdings Limited for unfair dismissal and for failure to pay him for accrued but untaken annual leave.
The tribunal stated that both complaints succeeded. No further findings of fact or legal reasoning were set out in this short judgment beyond the absence of a response and the resulting success of the Claimant's complaints.
The judgment did not assess remedy. It stated that the remedy to which the Claimant was entitled would be determined at the hearing on 4 December 2019.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment was entered under Rule 21 because no response to the claim was received. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the Respondent failed to pay the Claimant for accrued but untaken annual leave. The remedy was not determined in this judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.