Case 3312419/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Tribunal upholds unlawful-deduction-from-wages and holiday-pay claims against Only Four Some (London) Ltd
The tribunal upheld the claimant's claims and ordered the respondent to pay £2,500.00 in arrears of pay and £576.92 in holiday pay. The judgment states that both sums were gross figures.
- Case reference
- 3312419/2019
- Decision date
- 26 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Harman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 22 October 2019, Employment Judge R Lewis entered a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Mr T Harman against Only Four Some (London) Ltd. The tribunal upheld the claimant's claims and ordered the respondent to pay £2,500.00 in arrears of pay and £576.92 in holiday pay. The judgment states that both sums were gross figures.
The order also stated that the respondent could comply by deducting and paying statutory deductions, provided it gave the claimant proof of deduction and payment. The extracted text contains no further factual findings or legal reasoning beyond the Rule 21 outcome and the monetary awards.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment of £2,500.00 in arrears of pay, described as a gross figure. | Upheld | — | £2,500 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal ordered payment of £576.92 holiday pay, described as a gross figure. | Upheld | — | £577 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,077
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.