Case 3312439/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Ruth Price v Vibrance Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3312439/2020
- Decision date
- 26 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G Tobin Members
- Venue
- Watford Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Ms J Hancock, Mr C Surrey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Ruth Price
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal gave a unanimous judgment that Mrs Ruth Price did not make a protected disclosure under s43B Employment Rights Act 1996 on 18 July 2020 and/or 19 May 2020. It also found that she was not subjected to the detriments alleged on the grounds of whistleblowing, contrary to s47B Employment Rights Act 1996.
As a result, the proceedings were dismissed. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing, and no written reasons were provided in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The tribunal found that the claimant did not make a protected disclosure under s43B ERA 1996 on 18 July 2020 and/or 19 May 2020, and was not subjected to the detriments claimed under s47B ERA 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s43B ERA 1996
- s47B ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.