Case 3312466/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person. For the v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 3312466/2020
- Decision date
- 23 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Appearances
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person. For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe preliminary hearing concerned whether the claimant should be allowed to amend his claim to add a detriment claim based on having made protected disclosures. The original claim form alleged discriminatory treatment attributed to race and did not mention any protected disclosure.
The tribunal considered the proposed amendment to be a substantial alteration adding a new cause of action. It noted the timing of the proposed amendment, the way the issue had arisen, the likely need for further disclosure and witness evidence, and the prejudice to the respondent, and refused the application to amend.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The tribunal refused an application to amend the claim to add a protected disclosure detriment claim; it did not determine the merits of that proposed claim. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Selkent Bus Company Limited v Moore [1996] UKEAT151
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.