Case 3312481/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C O'Hare v Chipro Construction Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3312481/2022
- Decision date
- 26 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C O'Hare
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Mr C O'Hare against Chipro Construction Ltd. The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £9,999.98 gross.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £5,384.61. The judgment does not separately break the award into further components beyond those two sums, and it records the decision as sent to the parties on 26 March 2023.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records a Rule 21 decision and states that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. The amount is stated as £9,999.98 gross. | Upheld | — | £10,000 |
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £5,384.61. | Upheld | — | £5,385 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,385
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.