Case 3312502/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr N Hall, Transport Manager — 2025
- Case reference
- 3312502/2023
- Decision date
- 13 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment concerns the claimant's application to amend his claim. The Tribunal allowed the amendment to include whistleblowing, described in the judgment as automatic unfair dismissal pursuant to a protected disclosure under s.103A.
The Tribunal denied the application to amend to include disability discrimination claims. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written judgment states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The Tribunal allowed an application to amend the claim to include whistleblowing, described as automatic unfair dismissal pursuant to a protected disclosure under s.103A. This was an amendment decision, not a final merits outcome. | Other | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The Tribunal denied the application to amend to include disability discrimination claims. This was an amendment decision, not a final merits outcome. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.103A
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.