Miss C Merriman v Alfsware Limited — 2026

Case reference: 3312503/2020
Decision date: 29 April 2026
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Ord Date

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss C Merriman

Respondent

Alfsware Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The respondent did not dispute the claimant’s complaints. The tribunal therefore entered judgment for Miss C Merriman in full on the claims before it. The judgment records awards of £394.08 for breach of contract described as unpaid notice pay, £131.16 for unpaid wages, £87.20 for unpaid annual leave accrued at the time of termination of employment, and £591.12 as a statutory redundancy payment.

The total sum ordered was £1,203.56. The judgment is a short default judgment and does not set out any disputed evidence, legal test, or separate reasoning beyond recording that the complaints succeeded because they were not disputed.

Claims and outcomes

4 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Breach of contract	Awarded as unpaid notice pay.	Upheld	—	£394
Unlawful deduction from wages	Awarded as unpaid wages.	Upheld	—	£131
Holiday pay	Awarded as unpaid annual leave accrued at termination of employment.	Upheld	—	£87
Redundancy	Awarded as a statutory redundancy payment.	Upheld	—	£591

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £1,204; across all upheld claims

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.