Case 3312516/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P. Warren v Net Zero Buildings Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3312516/2020
- Decision date
- 18 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McNeill QC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P. Warren
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 2 November 2021, the tribunal gave the respondent 14 days to make written representations, or to request a hearing to make representations, as to why the response should not be struck out. The stated grounds were that the response had not been actively pursued and that the proceedings had been conducted unreasonably by or on behalf of the respondent.
The respondent did not make written representations and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the response under rule 37. It recorded that the respondent would remain entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions of the tribunal, but would only be entitled to participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment strikes out the respondent's response under rule 37. It does not determine the substantive claim(s) on the merits. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.