Case 3312517/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Kaur v Tesco Stores Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3312517/2021
- Decision date
- 19 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Welch
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Kaur
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt an open preliminary hearing on 19 August 2022, Employment Judge Welch sat alone to consider the matter. The judgment records that the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to consider the claimant's claims.
The claims were therefore dismissed. The judgment states that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The gov.uk listing category identifies unfair dismissal. The judgment states the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to consider the claimant's claims, which were dismissed. No written reasons are included. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.