Case 3312523/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Bilea v Supremframes Services Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3312523/2023
- Decision date
- 9 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Bilea
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Mr M Bilea succeeded on an unlawful deduction from wages claim against Supremframes Services Ltd. The tribunal recorded that the claimant was a worker engaged to work for the respondent and amended the respondent's name to Supremframes Services Ltd, being satisfied that the company had been properly served.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,650, described as 11 days at £150 per day gross. No separate split of the award into different heads was given.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,650, described as 11 days at £150 per day gross. | Upheld | — | £1,650 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,650
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.