Mrs C Osier v Avalake Ltd — 2025

Case reference: 3312529/2023
Decision date: 22 January 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Graham

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mrs C Osier

Respondent

Avalake Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

By letters dated 25 July 2024, 4 October 2024, and 20 November 2024, the Tribunal gave Mrs C Osier an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that she had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 25 February 2024 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.

Mrs C Osier did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. Employment Judge Graham therefore struck out the claim on 30 December 2024. The judgment records no substantive findings on the merits and no monetary award.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment records only that the claim was struck out under rule 37. It does not identify the underlying substantive claim type in the extracted text. The Tribunal had given the Claimant opportunities by letters dated 25 July 2024, 4 October 2024, and 20 November 2024 to make representations or request a hearing because she had not complied with the order dated 25 February 2024 and had not actively pursued the claim.	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.