Case 3312532/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v PTM International Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3312532/2021
- Decision date
- 6 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a claim for accrued holiday entitlement said to be unpaid at the termination of his employment. He said his resignation took effect on 17 October 2020; the respondent said it was 16 October 2020. On either date, the ordinary three-month time limit for presenting the claim would have expired on 16 January 2021.
The ACAS early conciliation certificate showed a notification date of 17 January 2021 and a certificate date of 28 February 2021. The tribunal held that because the primary limitation period had already expired before 17 January 2021, the early conciliation period did not extend time. It also said that even if time had been extended, the claim should have been presented by 28 March 2021, but it was not presented until 28 June 2021, more than six months late.
The claimant said the delay happened because the respondent had strung him along with excuses and he did not know the three-month time limit. The tribunal found that his ignorance of time limits was unreasonable because he could have researched the issue online, particularly if he believed he was being strung along. It also found that, even after he went to ACAS and became aware he needed to issue proceedings, four months elapsed before the claim was presented, which was not a reasonable time.
The tribunal therefore concluded that it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented in time and that, in any event, it was not presented within a reasonable time thereafter. The claim was therefore struck out for lack of jurisdiction.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment heading states the claim is dismissed, but the reasons state the tribunal struck the claim out for lack of jurisdiction because it was presented out of time. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- reasonably practicable
- reasonable time thereafter
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.