Case 3312533/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr James-Pike (in person) For the v Ms Wroe (solicitor) — 2022
- Case reference
- 3312533/2021
- Decision date
- 19 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cowen Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr James-Pike (in person) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis written judgment records the tribunal's decision on the claimant's application to extend time for submission of the tribunal claim. Employment Judge Cowen stated that, for the reasons given in the oral judgment at the remote hearing, the application was permitted.
The judgment does not set out the underlying merits of the claim or any liability findings. It is limited to the procedural issue of extending time, and the written reasons refer back to the oral judgment delivered at the remote hearing.
No remedy, award, or protected characteristic is identified in the written judgment. No further substantive outcome is recorded in the extracted text beyond the grant of the extension application.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The written judgment records only that the claimant's application to extend time for submission of the tribunal claim was permitted following the oral judgment at the remote hearing. No substantive liability decision is recorded in this text. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.