Case 3312536/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Couzens v NWC Realisations Ltd (in administration) — 2023
- Case reference
- 3312536/2020
- Decision date
- 10 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Couzens
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal did not decide the underlying merits of Mr K Couzens' claim. It recorded that the respondent, NWC Realisations Ltd (in administration), had been dissolved and that the claimant had not applied to have the company restored to the Register of Companies.
On 11 July 2023 the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment dated 9 August 2023 records no substantive liability finding and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not determine the merits of the claim; it states that the claim is struck out because the respondent company had been dissolved and the claimant had not applied to restore it to the Register of Companies. The tribunal also noted that, after giving the claimant an opportunity on 11 July 2023 to explain why the claim should not be struck out for lack of active pursuit, no acceptable reason was provided. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.