Case 3312551/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Kobielnik v Shorts Group Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3312551/2020
- Decision date
- 26 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Kobielnik
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 26 May 2022 Employment Judge Anstis recorded that the claimant had withdrawn the entirety of her case. The judgment states that the complaints of unlawful discrimination and unfair dismissal were dismissed on withdrawal. The holiday pay and redundancy pay claims were treated differently: they were not dismissed on withdrawal, but were noted as having been withdrawn and were at an end.
The judgment contains no merits findings and no award of compensation or other remedy. It is a short disposal judgment only, recording the procedural end of the proceedings rather than determining substantive issues in dispute.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Complaint described in the judgment only as unlawful discrimination; no protected characteristic is specified in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed on withdrawal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states this claim was not dismissed on withdrawal, but was noted as having been withdrawn and was at an end. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment states this claim was not dismissed on withdrawal, but was noted as having been withdrawn and was at an end. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.