Case 3312553/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Harrison v Gist Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3312553/2022
- Decision date
- 3 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Harrison
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that any claims other than direct disability discrimination and discrimination arising from disability, both in relation to the claimant's dismissal, were dismissed.
The judgment does not set out findings on the merits of the two disability discrimination claims or record any remedy. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, with written reasons to be provided only if requested within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination in relation to the claimant's dismissal was expressly excluded from the dismissal of other claims; the judgment does not record a final determination of this claim. | Other | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from disability in relation to the claimant's dismissal was expressly excluded from the dismissal of other claims; the judgment does not record a final determination of this claim. | Other | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment dismissed any claims other than the two specified disability discrimination claims. The extracted text does not separately name unfair dismissal, but the case listing included unfair dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.