Case 3312558/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Joyce v Hillview Medical Centre — 2025
- Case reference
- 3312558/2023
- Decision date
- 4 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harrison Representation
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Joyce
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs J Joyce worked for Hillview Medical Centre from 1 January 2019 until 28 August 2023 as an Advanced Nurse Practitioner. After she fractured her wrist in March 2023, the tribunal found that the respondent allowed her to work from home, communicated regularly with her about her recovery, and later obtained occupational health input. It rejected the claimant's case that the respondent pressured her to return to work in the practice, ignored her concerns, or imposed a clinic that was more demanding than her normal working pattern.
The tribunal found that the respondent did not breach its duty of care and did not act in a way that destroyed or seriously damaged mutual trust and confidence. It held that the clinics on 1 and 5 June 2023 were set in line with occupational health advice at 75% of contractual hours, and that when the claimant raised concerns on 5 June, the practice manager immediately offered to discuss reducing her hours further. The tribunal also found that no grievance had been raised in a way that engaged the respondent's grievance policy and that there was no failure to follow the ACAS Code. The constructive dismissal claim therefore failed.
On the wages claim, the tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence that she worked from home in March 2023 in amended duties and was not overpaid. It found that the later recalculation of her hours and the August 2023 deduction for 18.5 hours of work was an unauthorised deduction from wages under Part II of ERA 1996. The respondent was ordered to pay the gross sum of £560.74.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Claim pleaded as unfair dismissal contrary to s.95(1)(c) ERA 1996, i.e. constructive dismissal. The tribunal found no fundamental breach, no breach of the implied term of trust and confidence, and no failure to follow the ACAS Code. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant had worked the relevant hours in March 2023 and had not been overpaid. The later August 2023 deduction in respect of 18.5 hours was unauthorised. | Upheld | — | £561 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £561
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.95(1)(c) ERA 1996
- Western Excavating v Sharpe [1978] ICR 221 CA
- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.14(1) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.