Case 3312562/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Johnson v African Caribbean Leadership Company Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3312562/2021
- Decision date
- 19 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Caiden Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Johnson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr A Johnson presented his ET1 on 30 June 2021 after being dismissed for redundancy on 30 April 2021. The hearing took place at Watford on 18 and 19 January 2023 before Employment Judge Caiden. On 18 January the respondent did not attend and asked for a postponement, saying the hearing had been diarised for 23 and 24 January 2023. The tribunal refused that application, applying Rules 29 and 47 of the ET Rules, the overriding objective and the Presidential Guidance, and decided to hear the case in the respondent's absence.
On the unlawful deduction claims, the tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence that the first week's wages had been held back as a 'week in hand' and should have been repaid when the employment ended, so it awarded £189.65. It also accepted that he had worked average overtime of 3.1 hours per week between 30 June 2019 and 4 April 2020, that there was no evidence of time off in lieu, and that the contractual and minimum wage evidence supported the claimed figure of £1,018.04. The separate furlough-pay allegation failed because the tribunal treated it as a complaint about what could have been claimed from the furlough scheme, not wages owed by the respondent.
The tribunal found that holiday pay remained outstanding on termination. It accepted that 9 days of leave were unpaid, including carried-over leave from the previous year, and held that the holiday pay rate should include the claimant's ordinary pay plus the overtime element for holiday pay purposes, leading to an award of £375. It then dealt with statutory notice pay and statutory redundancy pay under the Employment Rights Act 1996 and the Coronavirus week's-pay regulations: voluntary overtime was excluded from the week's-pay calculation under s.221 ERA 1996, but the pay rate could not fall below national minimum wage. The dispositive orders award £131.36 for wrongful dismissal/notice pay and £184.80 for statutory redundancy pay, producing a total award of £1,898.85.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Week-in-hand payment withheld from the first payslip was accepted as repayable on termination. | Upheld | — | £190 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal accepted average overtime of 3.1 hours per week between 30 June 2019 and 4 April 2020 and awarded the claimed sum. | Upheld | — | £1,018 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed because the claim was about what could have been claimed from the furlough scheme rather than wages owed by the respondent. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Holiday pay on termination was accepted as owing, including carried-over leave from the previous year, and the rate included overtime for holiday pay purposes. | Upheld | — | £375 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Statutory notice pay claim; the reasons discuss 11 weeks and an NMW-adjusted week rate, but the dispositive paragraph orders £131.36. | Upheld | — | £131 |
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy pay shortfall based on a week rate of £142.56 versus £131.36 paid. |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,899
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
14 references- Rule 29 ET Rules
- Rule 47 ET Rules
- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.23 ERA 1996
- Timbulas v Construction Workers Guild Ltd
- Regulation 14 WTR 1998
- Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Stringer
- Dudley MBC v Willetts
- s.86 ERA 1996
- s.221-224 ERA 1996
- Employment Rights Act 1996 (Coronavirus, Calculation of a Week's Pay) Regulations 2020
- Tarmac Roadstone Holdings Ltd v Peacock
- Refrigeration Norwest (Chester) Ltd v Unwin
- Paggetti v Cobb
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.