Case 3312594/2022 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Mr A Fernandes (2) Mr J Sieniuc (3) Mr K Sieniuc v CTF Electrical Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3312594/2022
- Decision date
- 27 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge George Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(1) Mr A Fernandes (2) Mr J Sieniuc (3) Mr K Sieniuc
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 37 strike-out judgment concerning claims brought by Mr A Fernandes, Mr J Sieniuc and Mr K Sieniuc against CTF Electrical Ltd. By a letter dated 18 February 2023, the Tribunal gave the claimants an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out on the basis that they had not complied with the Tribunal's order of 7 January 2023 and that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimants did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying employment claims, and it records no compensation or other monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment is a rule 37 strike-out decision. It states that the claim was struck out because the claimants did not comply with the Tribunal's order dated 7 January 2023 and the claim had not been actively pursued. The text does not specify the underlying substantive claim type(s). | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.