Case 3312670/2019 · Employment Tribunal
I Ashworth A Parker v Secretary of State for BEIS and others — 2023
- Case reference
- 3312670/2019
- Decision date
- 16 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
I Ashworth A Parker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 17 July 2023, the tribunal gave the claimants an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on whether the claims against the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy should be struck out because they had no reasonable prospect of success.
By letter dated 9 August 2023, the claimants’ representative confirmed that there were no objections to the proposed strike out. The tribunal therefore struck out those claims. The judgment states that this did not affect any claims against any other respondent, and that case management orders in relation to those claims would be sent separately.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type. It records only that all claims against the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy were struck out under rule 37 after the claimants’ representative confirmed there were no objections to the proposed strike out. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.