Case 3312671/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr LA Bacica v Walls And Floors Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3312671/2020
- Decision date
- 28 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laidler Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr LA Bacica
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Laidler heard the matter remotely by CVP at Bury St Edmunds on 30 April 2021. The written judgment records that the claim was presented outside the statutory time period and that the tribunal was satisfied it was reasonably practicable to have presented it in time.
The claim was therefore dismissed. The record does not contain any substantive findings on the underlying breach of contract or unlawful deduction from wages complaints, and no monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not separate the claim into individual heads, but the listed breach of contract complaint was dismissed because the claim was presented outside the statutory time period and the tribunal was satisfied it was reasonably practicable to have presented it in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not separate the claim into individual heads, but the listed unlawful deduction from wages complaint was dismissed because the claim was presented outside the statutory time period and the tribunal was satisfied it was reasonably practicable to have presented it in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.