Case 3312672/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Webb (in person) For the v Ms Agibade (Peninsula) — 2023
- Case reference
- 3312672/2022
- Decision date
- 22 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hanning Appearances
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Webb (in person) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningPrior to the hearing, the respondent conceded the majority of the claimant’s claims and adduced no evidence. The claimant gave evidence on the matters that remained disputed and the respondent made submissions. The tribunal therefore determined only the live issues before it on the written and oral material available at the hearing on 13 April 2023 before Employment Judge Hanning.
The claimant’s claim for unlawful deduction from wages succeeded. The tribunal held that the respondent was required to pay £11,156.01 being net salary due for July and September 2022, together with £4,210.00 subject to deductions for tax and national insurance. The judgment does not separate any additional remedy components beyond those sums.
A document submitted on 16 March 2023 referred to ‘automatically unfair redundancy’ and appeared to amount to an unparticularised victimisation claim. The tribunal recorded that no permission had been given to amend the claim in that way, so it was not a live claim and did not fall to be determined. The tribunal added that if the claimant wished to pursue victimisation, he would need to make a formal application to add that claim, with proper details of the protected act relied on, by 27 April 2023.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claim well founded and ordered payment of £11,156.01 net salary due for July and September 2022 plus £4,210.00 subject to deductions for tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £15,366 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,366
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.