Case 3312673/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Miah v Daiichi Sankyo UK Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3312673/2020
- Decision date
- 17 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Miah
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis written record is a brief Rule 78E judgment from a hearing at Bury St Edmunds on 30 September 2022 before Employment Judge K J Palmer. It does not set out any findings on the underlying merits of the dispute.
The only operative order recorded is that, by consent, the Claimant was ordered to pay the Respondent's costs in the sum of £22,000. The judgment does not split that figure into any compensatory components or link it to any substantive tribunal finding.
The record also states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No further reasoning appears in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The written record is a Rule 78E judgment made by consent and only records that the Claimant was ordered to pay the Respondent's costs; it does not record any merits determination of a breach of contract claim. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £22,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.