Case 3312675/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Asskoumi v DAZU Heard: By CVP — 2021
- Case reference
- 3312675/2020
- Decision date
- 28 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Asskoumi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Asskoumi brought a claim against DAZU for detriment arising from protected disclosures and a claim of unfair dismissal. The case was heard by CVP on 28 May 2021 before Employment Judge M Warren.
The tribunal dismissed the protected-disclosure detriment claim because it had been presented out of time. No substantive findings on liability are recorded in the written judgment beyond that limitation decision.
The unfair dismissal claim was struck out because the tribunal considered that it had no reasonable prospects of success. The judgment records no monetary award and no separate remedy assessment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The Claimant's detriment claim for having made protected disclosures was dismissed because it was made out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal claim was struck out on the ground that it had no reasonable prospects of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.