Case 3312690/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Grimwood v Riverwalk School — 2019
- Case reference
- 3312690/2019
- Decision date
- 26 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Grimwood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 12 October 2019, the Tribunal gave Ms C Grimwood an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why her claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that she had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 26 March 2019 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
Ms Grimwood did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The hearing listed for 11 November 2019 to 13 November 2019 did not take place, and no substantive findings were made on the underlying unfair dismissal claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out under rule 37 because the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order dated 26 March 2019 and had not actively pursued the claim. The tribunal did not determine the substantive merits. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.