Case 3312695/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Marian-Pillai (Solicitor) For the v IK14 Restaurants Ltd (In Voluntary Liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 3312695/2023
- Decision date
- 18 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Marian-Pillai (Solicitor) For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 28 October 2025 before Employment Judge K J Palmer sitting alone, the claimant, Ms S Rajanathan, was represented by Mr D Marian-Pillai and there was no attendance for the respondent, IK14 Restaurants Limited (in voluntary liquidation). The tribunal recorded that the respondent's response had been struck out and therefore stated that the claimant's claims for automatic unfair dismissal under section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and for detriments arising from a protected disclosure under section 47B of that Act both succeeded.
For the automatic unfair dismissal claim, the tribunal awarded a basic award of £576.59. It then awarded a compensatory element comprising £500 for loss of statutory rights, £52,375.16 for loss of earnings from 3 August 2023 to 28 October 2025, and £2,643.70 for loss of pension, giving a compensatory award of £55,518.86 before uplift. The tribunal added a 25% uplift for failure to follow the ACAS Code of Conduct, producing a total compensatory award of £69,398.32 and a total unfair dismissal award of £69,974.91.
Recoupment applied. The tribunal stated that the prescribed element was £52,375.16 and that it related to the period 3 August 2023 to 28 October 2025. It also recorded that the amount by which the total monetary award exceeded the prescribed element was £17,599.75. On the protected-disclosure detriment claim, the tribunal awarded £5,000 for injury to feelings. The total payable by the respondent in the tribunal claim was £74,974.91.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Automatic unfair dismissal under section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996; the respondent's response had been struck out. The tribunal awarded a basic award, a compensatory award, and a 25% uplift for failure to follow the ACAS Code of Conduct. | Upheld | — | £69,975 |
| Whistleblowing | Claim for detriments arising from a protected disclosure under section 47B Employment Rights Act 1996; the tribunal awarded £5,000 for injury to feelings. | Upheld | — | £5,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £74,975
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £577
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £69,398
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 47B Employment Rights Act 1996
- ACAS Code of Conduct
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.