Case 3312718/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Mr C Dove (Manager at the respondent) — 2023
- Case reference
- 3312718/2022
- Decision date
- 30 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fredericks Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment by consent at Watford via CVP on 30 March 2023 before Employment Judge Fredericks. The tribunal recorded that Mr M Pardoe was unfairly dismissed by Digraph Transport Supplies Ltd on 26 July 2022. It also recorded that he was wrongfully dismissed on the same date and was owed notice pay.
The judgment further records that the claimant's claim for wages, and the remedy for the unfair and wrongful dismissal claims, had been settled between the parties on confidential terms in a separate consent order. No monetary figure is stated in the judgment text, and no further reasons or legal tests are set out because the matter was disposed of by consent.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Judgment by consent recorded that the claimant was unfairly dismissed by the respondent on 26 July 2022. | Upheld | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Judgment by consent recorded that the claimant was wrongfully dismissed on 26 July 2022 and was owed notice pay. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers to the claimant's 'claim for wages'; it states that that claim, and the remedy for the unfair and wrongful dismissal claims, were settled between the parties on confidential terms in a separate consent order. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.