Case 3312718/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Smith v GXO Logistics UK Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3312718/2023
- Decision date
- 2 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cowen Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was issued under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. It records the claimant as Mr S Smith and the respondent as GXO Logistics UK Ltd.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £42,096.44 in total. The extracted judgment text does not provide reasons, identify separate heads of loss, or allocate the award between the claims identified in the listing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The gov.uk listing categorises the case as unfair dismissal, and the Rule 21 judgment orders payment to the claimant, but the extracted judgment text does not identify the claim or split the award by claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The gov.uk listing categorises the case as breach of contract, and the Rule 21 judgment orders payment to the claimant, but the extracted judgment text does not identify the claim or split the award by claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £42,096
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.